Maine has joined many cities, counties, and states, rejecting dangerously biased surveillance technologies like. The new law, the most robust statewide facial recognition law in the country, not only received broad, bipartisan support but passed unanimously in both state legislature chambers. Lawmakers and advocates spanning the political spectrum — from the progressive lawmaker who sponsored the bill to the Republican members who voted it out of committee, from the ACLU of Maine to state law enforcement this significant victory for Mainers and anyone who cares about their right to privacy.
Maine is the latest success story in the nationwide movement to ban or tightly regulate facial recognition technology, an effort led by grassroots activists and organizations like the ACLU. From the Pine Tree State to the Golden State,to regulate facial recognition demonstrate a broad recognition that we can’t let technology determine the boundaries of our freedoms in the digital 21st century.
Facial recognition technology poses a profound threat to civil rights and civil liberties. Without democratic oversight, governments can use the technology as a tool for dragnet surveillance, threatening our freedoms of speech and association, due process rights, and right to be left alone. Democracy itself is at stake if this technology remains unregulated. Facial recognition technology poses a profound threat to civil rights and civil liberties.
We know the burdens of facial recognition are not borne equally, as Black and brown communities — mainly Muslim and immigrant communities — are already targets of discriminatory government surveillance. Making matters worse, face surveillance algorithms tend to haveaccurately analyzing the faces of darker-skinned people, women, older people, and children. Simply put: Technology is dangerous when it works — and when it doesn’t.
But not all approaches to regulating this technology areequal. Maine is among the first in the nation to pass comprehensive statewide regulations. Despite from civil rights, community, and religious liberty organizations, Washington was the first to give a weak law. The law passed in large part because of strong . Washington’s facial recognition law would still allow to sell their technology to every conceivable government agency worth millions of dollars.
In contrast, Maine’s law strikes a different path, putting the interests of ordinary Mainers above the profit motives of. Maine’s new law prohibits using facial recognition technology in most government areas, including in and for surveillance purposes. It creates carefully carved-out exceptions for law enforcement to use facial recognition, creating standards for its use and avoiding the we’ve seen in other parts of the country. Importantly, it prohibits using facial recognition technology to conduct surveillance of as they go about their business in Maine, attending political meetings and protests, visiting friends and family, and seeking healthcare.
In Maine, law enforcement must nowcause standard before making a facial recognition request, and they cannot use a facial recognition match as the sole basis to arrest or search someone. Nor can local police departments buy, possess, or use their facial recognition software, ensuring that Maine’s government officials will not use shady technologies like Clearview AI behind closed doors, as in other .
Maine’scommunities from being harmed by new, untested surveillance technologies like facial recognition. But we need a federal approach, not only a piecemeal local system, to effectively protect Americans’ privacy from facial surveillance. That’s why Americans must support the , a bill introduced by members of both houses of Congress last month.
The ACLUin the United States from invasive surveillance. We urge all Americans to ask their members of Congress to join the movement to halt facial recognition technology and support it, too.