It is 1928, and you are walking in Central Park, saxophone and wren song in the April air, when you spot her beneath the colossal leafing elm with her binoculars. You mistake her for another pearled Upper East Side lady who has taken to birding in the privileged boredom of her middle age. And who could blame you? In some obvious ways, born into a wealthy New York family to a British father whose first cousin was Charles Dickens — she takes the markings. In some invisible ways — in the strata of personhood that our unchosen surfaces and accidents of birth are apt to conceal and shortchange — she is anything but.
Within a quarter-century — a span in which she would change theof culture and the vitality of nature for centuries to come — she would be celebrated on the pages of the nation’s most esteemed cultural journal as “the only honest, unselfish, indomitable hellcat in the history of conservation.” Those she held uncomfortably accountable would deride her as “a boiling potato” and a “common scold” — but that accountability would revolutionize policies and mindsets. She would become things the words for which — words all of us now live with, for something many of us are living — did not yet exist in the popular lexicon: dissident, activist, citizen scientist.
Rosalie Edge (November 3, 1877–November 30, 1962) was well into her fifties when she became invested in the plight of birds after reading about the slaughter of 70,000 bald eagles in Alaska. She would later write:
Thousands of people who had within them a yearning toward nature, a deep-seated need to preserve its beauty, had been, in very truth, asleep. I know for I was one of them.
Until that point, her fierce wakefulness to justice had been channeled toward the plight of half of her species, culminating with the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920. But the multigenerational triumph left Edge — who had spent years composing pamphlets, delivering speeches, andchapter of the Woman Suffrage Party — with the postpartum hollowing of spirit that follows the completion of any project into which one has poured all of oneself.
But a person of passion and brilliance is never bored for long.
Whilewith her family, one night, Edge found herself reading and rereading a sixteen-page pamphlet — the era’s primary whistleblowing medium — titled “A Crisis in Conservation.” It exposed the ties the nation’s network of Audubon Societies had to gun and ammunition makers, and the consequent withholding of protection from species hunters considered pests or targets — including the bird, which this nation had taken for its symbol and spirit animal: the North American bald eagle.
Edge’s family summoned her for dinner, but she kept pacing the room in fiery disbelief, later recalling:
For what to me was dinner and the boulevards of Paris when my mind was filled with the tragedy of beautiful birds disappearing through the neglect and indifference of those who had at their disposal wealth beyond avarice with which these creatures might be saved?
As soon as she returned to America, still thinking about the eagles, Edge turned her wakeful intellect and indomitable passion for justice toward the broader fate of feathered beings in the hands of the thumbed.
On the eve of the Wall Street Crash of 1929, Rosalie Edge, in her dress and greying bun, walked across CentralAssociation of Audubon Societies. There, she calmly to hold its leaders accountable for the practices revealed by the pamphlet. After a stunned silence, various men in power took turns with defensive stabs at her credibility, then derided the rhetorical style of the booklet without addressing its substance. To Edge, this was the only evidence that something was amiss, that she must persist until it is righted.
And so she did. Over the years that followed, Rosalie Edge “stood up very often,” as she later recalled. After seeing a photograph ofhawks neatly lined up on the Appalachian forest floor, she traveled to Eastern Pennsylvania to witness the barbaric tradition that had occasioned the horror: recreational hunters gathering every autumn to shoot thousands of migrating hawks, having stalked out the perfect summit from which to intercept the migration path and perform the mass slaughter.
Realizing that cruelty of such scale and tradition required a solution just as grand, Edge had no qualms about using her privilege as an instrument of justice: She set out to buy the mountain.
Rosalie Edge was fifty-seven. In 1934, she borrowed $500 from Willard Gibbs Van Name (notWillard Gibbs, the American Museum of Natural History zoologist who had first awakened her passion for conservation and with whom she had founded the Emergency Conservation Committee two years earlier), signed a two-year lease with the option of eventually buying the 1,400-acre wilderness for $3,000, and hired two wardens — an ornithologically ardent couple from New England — to keep hunters away. And so was born.
Within a single migration cycle, hawk populations improved dramatically. The sanctuary became a pioneering conservation model, replicated by other conservationists in other habitats to protect other species. Nearly a, it is the world’s most active raptor conservation and observation site.
For the remaining two decades of her life, Rosalie Edge went on to become one of the most vocal, visible, and influential champions of conservation, inspiring the founding of The Nature Conservancy, The Environmental Defense Fund, and The Wilderness Society, inspiring generations of ordinary citizens with her ethos that the protection of nature is not something to be awaited from above but an essential civic duty for each of us, echoing her contemporary and kindred spirit Eleanor Roosevelt’s insistence on.
The New York Times never honored the city’s most ecologically impactful daughter with an obituary, not even in their wonderfully redemptive and honorable series of. In Rosalie Edge’s lifetime, the paper’s sole headline containing her name — printed the year Olympic has created thanks to the nationwide grassroots campaign Edge largely had spearheaded — hovers over a two-sentence report of a shoulder fracture that Edge, “known for establishing a mountain sanctuary for predatory birds,” had suffered upon slipping at a dance party. But she is redeemed at long last as one of the conservation heroes profiled and celebrated in Michelle Nijhuis’s altogether magnificent book ( ), in which Edge figures as an exquisite specimen of the species of visionaries Nijhuis interleaves into the broader story of conservation:
Each person profiled here stood, or stands, at ain the story of modern species conservation — a story which, for better and sometimes worse, still guides the international movement to protect life on earth… Though they often used pragmatic arguments to convert others to their cause, their motivations ran deeper. Many had started keeping company with members of other species to escape their troubles. Some were painfully shy or burdened with . Some were separated from their spouses when divorce was a scandal or drawn to their gender when homosexuality was taboo. Most of them knew something about suffering, and they found consolation in the life forms.
With an eye to Edge and her legacy, in particular, Nijhuis writes:
When Edge and Van Name founded the Emergency Conservation Committee, the language of ecology was still unfamiliar, even within the conservation movement. The food chain concept, sometimes called the food web, had been proposed only threeecologist Charles Elton. The word “ecosystem,” commonly used in ecology and conservation to describe an assemblage of interacting species and their physical surroundings, would not be coined until 1935. Many scientists — and the general public — continued to think of the as an assembly of relatively independent parts, not an interconnected whole.
Edge’s understanding of ecological relationships… set her apart from most conservationists of her time. Animal welfare activistsfor all species and opposition to most hunting, including many women who opposed the plume trade. But while Edge hated cruelty to individual animals, she devoted most of her energy to preventing the . She quotes Edge herself, who observed two generations after :
The birds and animals must benot merely because this species or another is interesting to some biologists but because each is a link in a living chain.
I first came within the aura of Edge’s influence during my long immersion in Rachel Carson’s world in the research for: Edge — who died months after and who never lived to see it inspire the creation of Earth Day and the founding of the Environmental Protection Agency — had been an early voice of dissent and warning against the heedless use of pesticides. She had furnished Carson, who visited Hawk Mountain two decades earlier, with critical DDT data about the pesticide’s savaging impact on birds.
While Rosalie Edge did not havepoetic gift, her fierce devotion to hawks inspired it: Carson, who would soon popularize the esoteric word ecology, composed one of her most breathtaking essays about the interconnectedness of nature upon returning from Hawk Mountain Sanctuary in 1945:
They came by like brown leaves drifting in the wind. Sometimes a lone bird rode the air currents; occasionally, several at a time, sweeping upward until they were only specks against the clouds or dropping down again toward the valley floor below us; sometimes, a great burst of them milling and tossing, like the flurry of leaves when a sudden gust of wind shakes loose a new batch from the forest trees.
On the horizon to the north, formed by a series of seven peaks running almost at right angles to the ridge on which we sit, an indistinct blur takes form against the sky. Second, by the second, the outlines sharpen. Soon the unmistakable silhouette of a hawk is etched on the gray.
Here on the mountaintop, we are in the sweep of all the winds out of a great emptiness of the sky, and the cold seeps through to the marrow of my bones. But hard, windy weather is hawk weather, and so I am glad, although I shiver and my nose reddens, and I look speculatively at my thermos of hot coffee… Mists are drifting over the valley. A grayness overhangs the sky, and the. It is an elemental landscape — a great rockpile atop a mountain, nearby a few trees stripped and twisted by the mountain winds, and a vast, pale, arching sky.
Perhaps it is not strange that I, who immensely love the sea, should find much in the mountains to remind me of it. I cannotwithout remembering that, though their journey is long, its end is in the sea. And always in these Appalachian highlands, there are reminders of those ancient seas that lay over all this land more than once. Halfway up the steep path to the lookout is a cliff formed of sandstone; long ago, it was laid down under shallow marine waters where strange and unfamiliar fishes swam; then the seas receded, the mountains were uplifted, and now wind and rain are crumbling the cliff away to the sandy particles that first composed it. And these whitened limestone rocks on which I am sitting — these, too, were formed under that Paleozoic ocean, of the myriad that drifted in its water. Now I lie back with half-closed eyes and try to realize that I am at the bottom of another ocean — an ocean of air on which the hawks are sailing.
Complement with Helen Macdonald’s stunning, then revisit Carson’s — delivered to us— months before Edge’s death.