Urban Decay Acai & 1993 Vice Hydrating Lipsticks Reviews & Swatches

by Joseph K. Clark

The texture was slightly denser in the tube, but it “melted” as it warmed up against my lips with light creaminess and slight tackiness on my lips. The shine was longer-lasting than the average lipstick due to that tackiness. It wore nicely for six hours, left a stain behind, and felt moisturizing.

FURTHER READING:
Formula Overview
for details on general performance and characteristics (like the scent).

  • MAC Toung’ n’ Chic (LE, $18.50) is more shimmery and warmer (95% similar).
  • Make Up For Ever Daring Mulberry (218) (P, $23.00) is cooler (95% identical).
  • Sephora Leo (93) (LE, $8.00) is lighter and less glossy (95% similar).
  • Tom Ford Beauty Jack (2016) (P, $36.00) is warmer (90% identical).
  • Bite Beauty Acai Smash (P, $24.00) is shimmery, lighter, and warmer (90% similar).
  • Maybelline Berry Bossy (DC, $7.49) is shimmery, lightweight, and more relaxed (90% identical).
  • Fenty Beauty Flamingo Acid (P, $18.00) is softer and warmer (90% similar).
  • MAC Joie de Vivre (P, $19.00) is cooler (90% identical).
  • Chanel Muted Fuchsia (124) (P, $40.00) is lighter, more relaxed, and less glossy (90% comparable).
  • Pat McGrath Wrecked (DC, $40.00) is darker and warmer (85% similar).

Formula Overview

$19.00/0.11 oz. – $172.73 Per Ounce

The formula is supposed to be “super-pigmented,” “hydrating,” and “long-lasting.” There are three finishes: cream, matte, and shine, and the way they feel, apply, and wear does depend on the finish, so I’ve broken the overview down by finish.

The Matte finish is comparable to the original Comfort Matte finish in the Vice Lipstick formula. They have a creamy, smooth consistency with more of a satin finish than an authentic matte finish. They will wear down to a semi-matte to a matte finish as some shine gets worn down. They were typically opaque, fairly forgiving of imperfections on the lips, and wore between four and six hours. A couple of shades, usually on the lighter end of the color spectrum, were more prone to settling into my lip lines.

Hydrating Lipsticks

There were a few shades in the Matte finish that were true mattes and were more of a traditional matte, though still smooth and emollient enough to apply without tugging, they were thinner and a touch “clingy” in comparison (just not to the point of emphasizing lip texture or being uncomfortable to wear).

The Cream finish is comparable to the original Cream finish in the Vice Lipstick formula. The texture was smooth, like a gel cream, as it was dense and lightly tacky, so it glided better once it warmed up against my lips. What I’ve always enjoyed–and enjoy about the reformulation–is the texture helps keep the color in place, makes it appear smoother, and sits better on my lips while still giving lots of shine. These shades were semi-opaque to opaque in coverage and had a wear time of around four to five hours.

The Shine finish is most comparable to the original Sheer finish in the Vice Lipstick formula, but to me, these were less comparable than the other two. The Shine finish is a smooth, gel-like balm with many glides, no tackiness, and isostasy. They are almost easy to over-apply as they are so soft and creamy (also why they come in the slim tube to prevent the lipstick from breaking at the base). These shades were more semi-opaque to primarily opaque with some transparency. They lasted around two to four hours.

Most of the shades were hydrating, though a few more exact matte shades were more non-drying. There was no discernible scent or taste.

Browse all of our Urban Decay Vice Hydrating Lipstick swatches.

Ingredients

Isononyl Isononanoate, Octyldodecanol, Oleyl Erucate, Silica, Phenyl Trimethicone, Ci 77891/Titanium Dioxide, Polyethylene, Sesamum Indicum Seed Oil/Sesame Seed Oil, Paraffin, Peg-45/Dodecyl Glycol Copolymer, Alumina, Cera Microcristallina/Microcrystalline Wax/Cire Microcristalline, Dimethicone, Kaolin, Synthetic Wax, Ci 15850/Red 7, Disteardimonium Hectorite, Ci 19140/Yellow 5 Lake, Tocopheryl Acetate, Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate, Ci 77499/Iron Oxides, Aluminum Hydroxide, Persea Gratissima Oil/Avocado Oil, Isopropyl Palmitate, Isopropyl Myristate, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Extract, Tocopherol, Hydrogenated Palm Glycerides Citrate, Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil/Sunflower Seed Oil, Rosmarinus Officinalis Leaf Extract/Rosemary Leaf Extract. (D268223/1).

Disclaimer: Ingredient lists areas available by the brand (or retailer) at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable to the product you’re purchasing or the brand or retailer’s website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.

The color had rich pigmentation in a single layer, applied evenly with only a smidgen of product that settled into my deeper lip lines (visible in the close-up photo but not in person). It stayed on well for five hours and felt hydrating over time.

FURTHER READING:
Formula Overview
for details on general performance and characteristics (like the scent).

  • Urban Decay 1993 (DC, $18.00) is lighter and cooler (90% similar).
  • Tarte Crop Top (P, $20.00) is darker (85% similar).
  • Bite Beauty Hard Cider (P, $24.00) is shimmery, darker, and muted (85% similar).
  • MAC Gabriel Zamora (LE, $20.00) is shimmery, lighter, and warmer (80% similar).
  • Becca Tawny (P, $24.00) is shimmery, more lightweight, and warmer (80% similar).
  • Proper Beauty Closer (P, $12.00) is darker and cooler (80% similar).
  • MAC Strip Me Down (LE, $20.00) is lighter, warmer, and less glossy (80% similar).
  • Marc Jacobs Beauty Hot Cocoa (P, $28.00) is lighter, brighter, and warmer (80% similar).
  • Tom Ford Beauty Public Display (Lip Color) (PiP) is softer and warmer (80% similar).
  • ColourPop 951 (P, $7.00) is lighter and more muted (80% similar).

Formula Overview

$19.00/0.11 oz. – $172.73 Per Ounce

The formula is supposed to be “super-pigmented,” “hydrating,” and “long-lasting.” There are three finishes: cream, matte, and shine, and the way they feel, apply, and wear does depend on the finish, so I’ve broken the overview down by finish.

The Matte finish is comparable to the original Comfort Matte finish in the Vice Lipstick formula. They have a creamy, smooth consistency with more of a satin finish than an authentic matte finish. They will wear down to a semi-matte to a matte finish as some shine gets worn down. They were typically opaque, fairly forgiving of imperfections on the lips, and wore between four and six hours. A couple of shades, usually on the lighter end of the color spectrum, were more prone to settling into my lip lines.

There were a few shades in the Matte finish that were true mattes and were more of a traditional matte, though still smooth and emollient enough to apply without tugging, they were thinner and a touch “clingy” in comparison (just not to the point of emphasizing lip texture or being uncomfortable to wear).

The Cream finish is comparable to the original Cream finish in the Vice Lipstick formula. The texture was smooth, like a gel cream, as it was dense and lightly tacky, so it glided better once it warmed up against my lips. What I’ve always enjoyed–and enjoy about the reformulation–is the texture helps keep the color in place, makes it appear smoother, and sits better on my lips while still giving lots of shine. These shades were semi-opaque to opaque in coverage and had a wear time of around four to five hours.

The Shine finish is most comparable to the original Sheer finish in the Vice Lipstick formula, but to me, these were less comparable than the other two. The Shine finish is a smooth, gel-like balm with many glides, no tackiness, and isostasy. They are almost easy to over-apply as they are so soft and creamy (also why they come in the slim tube to prevent the lipstick from breaking at the base). These shades were more semi-opaque to primarily opaque with some transparency. They lasted around two to four hours.

Most of the shades were hydrating, though a few truer matte shades were more non-drying. There was no discernible scent or taste.<img class=”img-fluid” src=”https://www.temptalia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/urban-decay_1993_003_ingredients.jpg” srcset=”https://www.temptalia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/urban-decay_1993_003_ingredients.jpg 760w, https://www.temptalia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/urban-decay_1993_003_ingredients-350×350.jpg 350w, https://www.temptalia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/urban-decay_1993_003_ingredients-150×150.jpg 150w, https://www.temptalia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/urban-decay_1993_003_ingredients-550×550.jpg 550w” width=”760″ height=”760″/>

Related Posts